I'll be the first to admit this collection of thoughts on books I've read isn't nearly as good as previous reviews.

So very many conflicting thoughts on this book. First of all, it was amazing. Hands down incredible. I wish I were closer to the novel (that I hadn't read it 4 months ago) so I could comment more intelligently on its super incredibleness. I remember my thoughts at the time were of women and men as they control society. I loved the scenes where the women looked to the men to see whether things were okay. Not to the circumstances, but to how the men were handling the circumstances. This acknowledgement didn't seem a position of weakness, but rather recognizing that when the men stopped handling life, it would be the woman's role to then handle life for them. I thought about how I react to life, and realized that I, too, often react more to how Tyler reacts to life rather than life itself.
I loved the description of Ma Joad and her role as a mother:
She seemed to know, to accept, to welcome her position, the citadel of the family, the strong place that could not be taken. And since Tom and the children could not know hurt or fear unless she acknowledged hurt and fear, she has practiced denying them in herself. And since, when a joyful thing happened, they looked to see whether joy was on her, it was her habit to build up laughter out of inadequate materials […] from position as healer, her hands had grown sure and cool and quiet; from her position as arbiter she had become as remote and faultless in judgment as a goddess. She seemed to know that if she swayed the family shook, and if she ever really deeply wavered or despaired the family would fall, the family will to function would be gone.These two thoughts served as the thesis for me (and I'm sure this is the meaning I drew out of the book because I am both a woman and a mother); that the terror of the government, the terror of the depression served to break society, to break the men involved in the story. I didn't have much confidence in the success of Tom's mission by the end of the novel, and even the sacrifice of Jim Casey (the Jesus Christ figure) didn't accomplish much in the immediate narrative (although, you could argue, it had a huge effect on the great big giant audience who rallied around the novel) but the women held the "fambly" together. The final scene seemed to indicate two things for me: one, when a young woman nurses an old man, conventions of society have been completely destroyed, but two, in that situation of utter moral and economic devastation, it is the women who are able to sustain, to succor, to make endure.
My other thoughts were that I need to read more happy books. I just kept thinking, "Can't they just get to California and be depressed already? I know this is not going to end well, and I've got 400 more pages of it not ending well."
That said, by the end I was satisfied in my disappointment.

I can't remember any specific thoughts I had, but I did hear that the movie of this ends before the children grow up, and I thought that would make the story far more tragic than the book. I thought the story was resolved through the daughter, whose name I can't remember at the moment.
Also, that Meggie's first husband is a jerk. I'd even go so far as to say jerkface.

This book changed my life. At least the way I eat.
For such a big statement, you'd think I'd have more to say, right? Not tonight. But I am giving an enrichment lesson on nutrition next Thursday, so maybe I'll digest my thoughts and post after that.
But everyone should definitely read this book.

This book was cute and was fun to read since I've always looked at quilting as a hobby I admire other people doing, but have never really felt pushed to pick up myself. I haven't really felt pushed to pick up the rest of the series.

Continued changing my life. Read the book. It will liberate you. And stay away from gogurts.

This book is one reason I have serious regrets about not staying up-to-date on my blog. This book needed some breakdown, some digestion, and this blog would have been the perfect place to do it. So if you've read the book, call me. Let's figure some things out. Except I might have to reread the book first to remember.

I've already proclaimed my love for Richard Russo on this blog, and he didn't disappoint me with this latest novel, but it wasn't quite as earth shaking as my favorite books by him, namely
Bridge of Sighs and
Straight Man. He did get me thinking about perspectives, and the fact that how we view a situation like a marriage or a family member might be completely different from how someone else might view that same situation. Ah, those sticky paradigms.
I do love a good unreliable narrator.

What is it about teen lit that would make someone leave the Grand America at 7:30 in the morning before their husband wakes up on her 8th anniversary to drive around the city looking for an open bookstore to buy the final book in a series because they just need to know how it ends?
Purely hypothetical, of course.
Target. Target was open. On 7200 S. A whole long ways away from the Grand America.

I reread parts of this book 4 or 5 times. It was like I was reading Twilight. Take that teen lit.

You know how I love me some Gregory Maguire.
This is the first book by him, however, that I liked as much as
Wicked. I liked the thought that we view ourselves through the perspectives of others until we get enough independence and identity to view ourselves though our own perspective. I also loved the historical context of the 1400s. There was some great intrigue at the time, enough to produce a thoroughly despicable wicked Queen.
For the record, I'd feel much more comfortable recommending this book than I would
Wicked.